|
PT1_22
Last update: 21-03-2022
|
ECC Recommendation
|
Cross border co-ordination at 26 GHz
|
|
ECC Recommendation on Frequency planning and frequency coordination for Land Mobile systems operating at 26 GHz.
|
S: 06-07-2018
T: 07-07-2023
|
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_27
Last update: 09-08-2021
|
Rev. ECC Decision
|
Study:
a) the condition to operate a 5G non-AAS connectivity for MCA in 1710-1785 MHz and 1805-1880 MHz; and
b) consider making NCU optional in all MCA bands
|
PT1_38
|
Update of technical conditions in ECC Decision (06)07 based on the CEPT Report developed under PT1_38
|
S: 06-03-2020
T: 01-07-2022
|
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_28
Last update: 03-01-2022
|
ECC Report
|
Conditions for MFCN in the band 2300-2400 MHz band.
|
PT1_29
|
Review of harmonised technical and regulatory conditions for the use of the band 2300-2400 MHz for MFCN for suitability for 5G while maintaining the current regulatory status of the band.
|
S: 06-03-2020
T: 04-11-2022
|
Review technical conditions to enable timely introduction of 5G and, when applicable, AAS, while ensuring adequate protection of other services and applications.
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_29
Last update: 19-11-2021
|
Rev. ECC Decision
|
Harmonised technical and regulatory conditions for the use of the band 2300 - 2400 MHz for MFCN.
|
PT1_28
|
Revise ECC Decision (14)02 to make the technical and regulatory conditions suitable for 5G while maintaining the current regulatory status of the band.
|
S: 05-03-2021
T: 03-03-2023
|
Review technical conditions to enable timely introduction of 5G and, when applicable, AAS, while ensuring adequate protection of other services and applications.
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_30
Last update: 21-03-2022
|
ECC Decision
|
Harmonised technical conditions for UAS “Aerial UE” usage in respective harmonised MFCN bands
|
PT1_18
PT1_45
|
On the basis of conclusions of ECC Report 309 and additional relevant studies relating to AAS systems in the 1800 MHz,2 GHz and 2.6 GHz bands, to develop harmonised technical conditions for UAS “Aerial UE” usages
|
S: 06-03-2020
T: 04-11-2022
|
Harmonised spectrum regulatory conditions for “aerial UEs” in the suitable MFCN bands ensure visibility for UAs standardisation, market development while ensuring confidence of all spectrum users,
This ECC framework will be also the relevant basis to trigger additional standardisation activities in ETSI on “out of band emission limits”, where appropriate and to enable practical implementation of “no fly zone”, at national level where needed.
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_34
Last update: 29-04-2022
|
ECC Decision
|
40.5-43.5 GHz: New ECC Decision
|
PT1_39
PT1_46
FM44_44
|
ECC Decision on MFCN harmonisation, comprising a band plan and technical conditions suitable for 5G, taking into account the radio applications according to ERC Report 25 (ECA table)
|
S: 06-03-2020
T: 04-11-2022
|
ECC #55 tasked ECC PT1 to study coexistence at the 40.5 GHz boundary between MFCN in 40.5-43.5 GHz and uncoordinated satellite earth stations in 39.5-40.5 GHz: ECC(21)027 Annex 07
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_37
Last update: 19-11-2021
|
CEPT Report
|
EC Mandate on 40 GHz mm Wave 5G (MFCN)
|
PT1_39
PT1_46
|
Response to the EC Mandate to develop least restrictive harmonised technical conditions suitable for next-generation (5G) terrestrial wireless systems for 40.5-43.5 GHz
|
S: 03-07-2020
T: 04-11-2022
|
Refer to EC “Mandate to CEPT to develop least restrictive harmonised technical conditions suitable for next-generation (5G) terrestrial wireless systems for priority frequency bands above 24 GHz” regarding Tasks 1, 2 and 4
Deliverables:
- March 2021 : draft for public consultation
- July 2021: final report
ECC #55 tasked ECC PT1 to study coexistence at the 40.5 GHz boundary between MFCN in 40.5-43.5 GHz and uncoordinated satellite earth stations in 39.5-40.5 GHz: ECC(21)027 Annex 07
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_39
Last update: 19-11-2021
|
ECC Recommendation
|
Guidelines to support the introduction of 5G while ensuring, in a proportionate way, the use of FSS receiving earth stations in the frequency band 40.5-42.5 GHz and the use of FSS transmitting earth stations in the frequency band 42.5-43.5GHz and the possibility for future deployment of these earth stations.
|
PT1_34
PT1_37
PT1_46
|
To develop guidelines/technical toolkits in order to assist administration to define how existing, planned and future earth stations can continue to operate or have the opportunity to be installed without significant impact on 5G deployment. This will address transmitting earth stations in the frequency band 42.5-43.5GHz and receiving earth stations in the frequency band 40.5-42.5GHz, for GSO and non-GSO satellite systems.
|
S: 20-11-2020
T: 04-11-2022
|
FSS Toolkit 40 GHz – Those guidelines /toolkits will address, as appropriate, methodology of calculations of coordination zones /contours. Also other elements such as examples of national approaches for clutter losses and deployment of FSS earth stations could be developed.
An ECC Recommendation with two separate Parts: FSS transmitting earth stations in 42.5-43.5GHz and receiving earth stations in 40.5-42.5GHz with relevant guidelines, toolkit and other elements as appropriate.
ECC #55 tasked ECC PT1 to study coexistence at the 40.5 GHz boundary between MFCN in 40.5-43.5 GHz and uncoordinated satellite earth stations in 39.5-40.5 GHz: ECC(21)027 Annex 07
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_40
Last update: 11-03-2022
|
ECC Report
|
Compatibility between MFCN operating in 3400-3800 MHz and Radio Altimeters (RA) operating in 4200-4400 MHz
|
FM_56
PT1_47
|
Assessment of susceptibility of deployed RA receivers operating in 4200-4400 MHz, while taking into account any civil aviation initiatives on improving RA receivers, in order to study the following compatibility scenarios:
1) Unwanted emissions from MFCN operating in 3400-3800 MHz into 4200-4400 MHz radio altimeters band
2) Impact of blocking of radio altimeters from 3400-3800 MHz MFCN in-band emissions
Note: the results of this study could trigger further actions as appropriate from ECC or other entities.
Provide relevant long term MFCN operational parameters in 3.4-3.8 GHz for the development of future MOPs by RTCA/EUROCAE for resilient radio altimeters.
|
S: 05-03-2021
T: 07-07-2023
|
It is recognised that realistic scenarios and parameters for RA and MFCN AAS parameters are needed before compatibility studies can be commenced.
Based on the results of the study, consider the need for possible future steps, e.g. improvement of RA susceptibility to interference, in particular regarding blocking characteristics.
It is to be noted that radio altimeters are used globally and once installed they are used over many years. Therefore, development of future MOPS(Minimum Operational Performance Standards) for RA should be forward-looking as well as considering the various 5G MFCN deployments already existing in frequency bands both below 4.2 GHz as well as above 4.4 GHz, in both Europe and globally.
|
In Progress
|
|
|
PT1_41
Last update: 04-03-2021
|
ECC Report
|
Coverage availability and performance aspects for 5G-NR
|
|
Develop a summary of potential metrics that can be used for measuring 5G coverage (availability of 5G services) and user experience (performance) considering 5G-NR using AAS and non-AAS:
1) Describe various aspects of 5G-NR in the different frequency ranges designated for MFCN, including beamforming of control and data channels to highlight differences with earlier generations of mobile technologies also including 5G-NR within MFCN network using DSS (dynamic spectrum sharing)
2) Describe practical options for defining coverage requirements by collecting data both via network management tool and in the field considering available measurement solutions and identifying the pros and cons of the different options.
3) Describe potential performance management metrics and counters, and identifying options to provide meaningful user experience information.
|
S: 05-03-2021
T: 01-07-2022
|
ECC Report 231 summarises various methods used by administrations to determine coverage obligations in force and how they are controlled/assessed. The report highlights the need to develop practical field measurement methods for LTE.
Meanwhile, 5G-NR implementing AAS have added more flexibility to the air interface along with beamforming. These aspects need to be taken into account when considering conventional methods to set coverage requirements or reporting on 5G coverage and performance for 5G-NR,especially in the context of AAS systems in the different frequency ranges designated to MFCN.
Since different countries are licensing spectrum in the low, mid-and mmWave bands, it is essential to consider these technological differences while setting coverage and performance requirements or meaningful information for consumers and end users.
|
In Progress
|
|